This dress is part of the collection of the V&A (Victoria and Albert Museum), produced in France between 1869 and 1870, it is an early example of the use of chemical dyes.
The V&A's catalogue description states:
"Vivid magenta-coloured
silk gives this dress a rich and flamboyant appearance. It was probably
dyed with one of the new synthetic colours produced from the late 1850s
onwards, although intense hues could also be created using natural
dyes. The artificial forms of magenta were very popular and a battle for
patents began as dyers sought to distinguish their inventions from
those of their competitors. In reality many of the dye samples from
different manufacturers looked exactly the same, and it was only the
exotic names, claims on colourfastness and improved visual quality that
set them apart. Other disputes arose over the health risk posed by the
wearing and production of garments coloured with synthetic dyes. In the
early 1870s a German chemist found traces of arsenic in fabric dyed with
magenta, which could leak out in washing, rain or perspiration. There
were also reports of serious skin conditions caused by exposure to
aniline dyes, and a dye firm in Switzerland was forced to close in 1864
due to arsenic pollution.
Brightly coloured fabrics also led to words of advice from the fashion magazines. The Englishwoman’s Domestic Magazine of March 1868 recommended that there should be no more than 'two positive colours in a lady's toilet' and that 'very bright tints' should be toned down with white, black or grey to prevent a gaudy appearance. Two shades of the same colour were considered very fashionable, particularly if the trimmings were of a contrasting fabric. (In this example, the difference in colour between the thread and material may have become more evident over time.) Satin bows and pleated bias-cut trimmings complement the ribbed silk of this dress perfectly, while delicate puffs of tulle inserted into the sleeves soften the impact of the dramatic colour. These details reveal the skill of eminent couturiers such as Madame Vignon, the maker of this gown, who was also patronised by the fashionable Empress Eugenie, wife of Napoleon III."
The full entry can be viewed on their website: link
The birth of synthetic dyestuffs is most closely linked to the color mauve and its early discovery and subsequent popularity. The quarterly magazine Cabinet published an excellent article in their 2007/2008 edition by author Shelly Jackson which discusses little known facts about the origin of the color. The full text can be viewed here (link) It is a highly recommended and fascinating read.
Brightly coloured fabrics also led to words of advice from the fashion magazines. The Englishwoman’s Domestic Magazine of March 1868 recommended that there should be no more than 'two positive colours in a lady's toilet' and that 'very bright tints' should be toned down with white, black or grey to prevent a gaudy appearance. Two shades of the same colour were considered very fashionable, particularly if the trimmings were of a contrasting fabric. (In this example, the difference in colour between the thread and material may have become more evident over time.) Satin bows and pleated bias-cut trimmings complement the ribbed silk of this dress perfectly, while delicate puffs of tulle inserted into the sleeves soften the impact of the dramatic colour. These details reveal the skill of eminent couturiers such as Madame Vignon, the maker of this gown, who was also patronised by the fashionable Empress Eugenie, wife of Napoleon III."
The full entry can be viewed on their website: link
The birth of synthetic dyestuffs is most closely linked to the color mauve and its early discovery and subsequent popularity. The quarterly magazine Cabinet published an excellent article in their 2007/2008 edition by author Shelly Jackson which discusses little known facts about the origin of the color. The full text can be viewed here (link) It is a highly recommended and fascinating read.












